<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.0-rc2" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>EnRUPT &#8211; The Simpler The Better</title>
		<link>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php</link>
		<description>From the authors of EnRUPT</description>
		<language>en-AU</language>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.0-rc2"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>Static Skype Supernodes</title>
			<link>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/09/05/static-skype-supernodes</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 04:47:51 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Georg Schwarz</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">News</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">71@http://www.enrupt.com/</guid>
						<description>I am a bit surprised that so far there were no comments on the list of static Skype supernodes that Sean O&amp;#8217;Neil has published along with his Skype RC4 code. It contains a list of 200 IP address and port number pairs hard-coded into every binary of Skype to be used as initial Skype supernodes. A simple analysis of those IP addresses using DNS and whois lookups sheds some interesting light on Skype's business model:</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am a bit surprised that so far there were no comments on the list of static Skype supernodes that Sean O&#8217;Neil has published along with his Skype RC4 code. It contains a list of 200 IP address and port number pairs hard-coded into every binary of Skype to be used as initial Skype supernodes. A simple analysis of those IP addresses using DNS and whois lookups sheds some interesting light on Skype's business model:]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/09/05/static-skype-supernodes#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Wanna Find Skype Users?</title>
			<link>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/09/05/wanna-find-skype-users</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:59:10 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Sean O&#8217;Neil</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">News</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">70@http://www.enrupt.com/</guid>
						<description>We are about to launch our new online service: locating Skype users. At first, it will only report their IP addresses, both external (routable WAN address) and internal (LAN address if the user is behind NAT, proxy or a firewall of any kind). If it becomes sufficiently popular, we are planning to...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We are about to launch our new online service: locating Skype users. At first, it will only report their IP addresses, both external (routable WAN address) and internal (LAN address if the user is behind NAT, proxy or a firewall of any kind). If it becomes sufficiently popular, we are planning to...]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/09/05/wanna-find-skype-users#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Identify Skype Users in HTTP Traffic</title>
			<link>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/08/22/identify-skype-users-in-http-traffic</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Sean O&#8217;Neil</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">News</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">69@http://www.enrupt.com/</guid>
						<description>While it's a holiday season, we are giving away another freebie as we have promised. One of the ways to identify the skype user from intercepted traffic is by its Skype update request.Skype checks for a new version on startup. The HTTP request looks like this:</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[While it's a holiday season, we are giving away another freebie as we have promised. One of the ways to identify the skype user from intercepted traffic is by its Skype update request.Skype checks for a new version on startup. The HTTP request looks like this:]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/08/22/identify-skype-users-in-http-traffic#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>DDoS etc</title>
			<link>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/07/09/ddos-etc</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:20:20 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Sean O&#8217;Neil</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">News</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">67@http://www.enrupt.com/</guid>
						<description>There seem to be some questions that a lot of people want answered urgently, as our post has caused a lot of stir and confusion:1. No, we did not take our blog offline since the last post. We are not hackers and we have nothing to be afraid of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[There seem to be some questions that a lot of people want answered urgently, as our post has caused a lot of stir and confusion:1. No, we did not take our blog offline since the last post. We are not hackers and we have nothing to be afraid of...]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/07/09/ddos-etc#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Skype's Biggest Secret Revealed</title>
			<link>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/07/07/skype-biggest-secret-revealed</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Sean O&#8217;Neil</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">News</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">66@http://www.enrupt.com/</guid>
						<description>For eight years, Skype enjoyed selling the world security by obscurity. We must admit, really good obscurity. I mean, really really good obscurity. So good that almost no one has been able to reverse engineer it out of the numerous Skype binaries. Those who could, didn't dare to publish their code, as it most certainly looked scarier than Frankenstein.The time has come to reveal this secret...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[For eight years, Skype enjoyed selling the world security by obscurity. We must admit, really good obscurity. I mean, really really good obscurity. So good that almost no one has been able to reverse engineer it out of the numerous Skype binaries. Those who could, didn't dare to publish their code, as it most certainly looked scarier than Frankenstein.The time has come to reveal this secret...]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/07/07/skype-biggest-secret-revealed#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>We Are Back</title>
			<link>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/07/07/we-are-back</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Sean O&#8217;Neil</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">News</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">65@http://www.enrupt.com/</guid>
						<description>Yes, www.enrupt.com has been down for months. Many of you have been wondering if it will ever return. Well, here is your answer. Yes, we are back.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, www.enrupt.com has been down for months. Many of you have been wondering if it will ever return. Well, here is your answer. Yes, we are back.]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2010/07/07/we-are-back#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>EnRUPT/8</title>
			<link>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2009/06/28/enrupt-8</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:08:08 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Sean O&#8217;Neil</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">News</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">64@http://www.enrupt.com/</guid>
						<description>After a long analysis and due consideration, we have decided to propose EnRUPT/8 for all three 64-bit variants: EnRUPT64x2-256/8, EnRUPT64x2-384/8 and EnRUPT64x2-512/8 as our updated SHA-3 submission.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[After a long analysis and due consideration, we have decided to propose EnRUPT/8 for all three 64-bit variants: EnRUPT64x2-256/8, EnRUPT64x2-384/8 and EnRUPT64x2-512/8 as our updated SHA-3 submission.]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2009/06/28/enrupt-8#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>India 15 years behind the US</title>
			<link>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2009/04/10/india_15_years_behind_the_us</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:57:09 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Sean O&#8217;Neil</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">News</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">63@http://www.enrupt.com/</guid>
						<description>While we are working on determining the best value for &amp;#239;rRUPT security parameter, we do not have much time for watching the news, but this is something we thought is worth your attention because of its irony:The US is outraged that India restricts symmetric encryption to 40-bit security.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[While we are working on determining the best value for &#239;rRUPT security parameter, we do not have much time for watching the news, but this is something we thought is worth your attention because of its irony:The US is outraged that India restricts symmetric encryption to 40-bit security.]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.enrupt.com/index.php/2009/04/10/india_15_years_behind_the_us#comments</comments>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
